PSEUDO-ANGLICISMS AND SEMANTIC DIVERGENCE OF ENGLISH BORROWINGS IN MODERN FRENCH

Authors

  • Vira Ruban ORCID: 0000-0002-4708-0656 PhD (Philology), Associate Professor at Department of Romance Languages, Kyiv National Linguistic University (Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine) 03150, Kyiv, 73, Velyka Vasylkivska Str. , Kyiv National Linguistic University image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-6530.2026.49.7-15

Keywords:

pseudo-Anglicisms, semantic divergence, English borrowings, French language, lexical borrowing, language contact, polysemy, semantic change

Abstract

The article examines the phenomenon of pseudo-Anglicisms in contemporary French, with a particular focus on their semantic divergence from corresponding English lexemes. Pseudo-Anglicisms are borrowings that retain an English form yet acquire meanings in French that differ substantially from those in the source language. Unlike false Anglicisms, which have no direct counterpart in English, pseudo-Anglicisms exist in the donor language but function with a distinct semantic value in French. The article analyzes how these lexemes undergo processes of semantic shift, morphological adaptation, polysemy formation, and cultural integration within the recipient language. The study highlights the distinction between pseudo-Anglicisms and false Anglicisms, demonstrating its theoretical significance for the classification of English borrowings and the development of a nuanced theory of lexical borrowing. Moreover, the paper examines the diachronic evolution of these borrowings, showing how semantic broadening, narrowing, and derivational processes shape their contemporary usage in French. By situating pseudo-Anglicisms within the broader context of language contact and globalization, this research provides valuable insights into the dynamic interactions between English and French and the productive role of English-derived lexemes in enriching modern French vocabulary.

References

1. De Grand Combe, F. (1954). De l’anglomanie en français. Français moderne, 22, 187–200.

2. George, K. E. M. (1976). Anglicisms in contemporary French. Modern Languages Journal. Linguistic Aspects, 51(1), 63–68.

3. Guilbert, L. (1959). Anglomanie et vocabulaire technique. Le Français moderne XXVII, 272–295.

4. Guilbert, L. (1975). La créativité lexicale. Paris: Larousse.

5. Guiraud, P. (1971). Les mots étrangers. Paris: PUF.

6. Léopold, J. (2021). Sommes-nous [réellement] envahis par les anglicismes ? Deux décennies d’anglicismes. Lengas, 89. https://doi.org/10.4000/lengas.5200

7. Misanchuk, M. (1997). Anglicismes dans la presse française: L'Express et le Nouvel Observateur (1991 à 1995). Calgary: Alberta.

8. Ruban, V. (2025). La catégorie d’emprunts anglais intégraux dans le discours des médias français contemporains. Problems of Semantics, pragmatics and cognitive linguistics, 48. https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-6530.2025.48.03

9. Saugera, V. (2017). La fabrique des anglicismes. Travaux de linguistique, 75(2), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.3917/tl.075.0059

10. Zanola, M. T. (1991). L’emprunt lexical anglais dans le français contemporain: Analyse d’un corpus de presse (1982–1989). Brescia: La Scuola.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ruban, V. (2026). PSEUDO-ANGLICISMS AND SEMANTIC DIVERGENCE OF ENGLISH BORROWINGS IN MODERN FRENCH. PROBLEMS OF SEMANTICS, PRAGMATICS AND COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS, 1(49), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-6530.2026.49.7-15