PROBLEMS OF ENGLISH PRONUNCIATION CORRECTION IN THE FIRST YEAR OF STUDY AT A LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITY

Authors

  • Natalia Nesterenko ORCID: 0009-0001-0199-5420 PhD (Philology), associate professor at Department of English Philology and Intercultural Communication Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine) 14 Taras Shevchenko Blvd., Kyiv, Ukraine, 01601 , Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv image/svg+xml
  • Kateryna Lysenko ORCID: 0000-0001-7655-1878 PhD (Philology), lecturer at Department of Foreign Languages for Mathematics Faculties Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine) 14 Taras Shevchenko Blvd., Kyiv, Ukraine, 01601 , Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-6530.2026.49.131-142

Keywords:

“nativization”, control of phonological means, intelligibility, recognition of phonetic contrasts, phonological competence, phonetic interference, intensive training, intonation contours, audio recording of one’s own speech

Abstract

The article examines the problems associated with correcting the English pronunciation of first-year students majoring in linguistic disciplines at higher education institutions. The authors emphasize that phonetic training cannot be considered a secondary component of language education, since the quality of pronunciation directly affects speech intelligibility, the effectiveness of oral communication, and the professional suitability of future philologists and translators. Pronunciation functions as an indicator of foreign-language competence, influencing both how speech is perceived by the listener and how the speaker is evaluated. The paper outlines the key parameters of phonetic competence, including accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility. Particular attention is paid to the risk of fossilization of non-target articulatory and prosodic patterns if insufficient attention is paid to pronunciation at the initial stage of language learning.

The authors propose a model of intensive initial pronunciation correction that involves systematic practice of articulatory settings, auditory categories, and intonation contours through the use of authentic audio materials, self-recording of speech, and technological tools such as Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Training (CAPT) and Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR). The importance of combining segmental and suprasegmental levels is emphasized, as well as maintaining a balance between a concentrated introductory block of phonetic training and distributed support throughout the semester. Special attention is given to the role of phonetic laboratories and individualized feedback, which significantly enhance the effectiveness of instruction.

The article presents arguments in favor of integrating pronunciation correction into the first-year curriculum as a compulsory module that ensures stable phonological control and improves the quality of oral interaction. In addition, the prospects of using dramatized activities as a second stage in developing intonational expressiveness and communicative flexibility are outlined. It is concluded that systematic pronunciation correction contributes to the development of the professional competence of future philologists, reduces the risks of phonetic interference, and corresponds to contemporary trends in teaching English as a global language.

References

1. Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230290518

2. Bihych, O. B., Borysko, N. F., Boretska, H. E., et al. (2013). Metodyka navchannia inozemnykh mov i kultur: teoriia i praktyka [Methods of teaching foreign languages and cultures: Theory and practice] (S. Yu. Nikolaieva, Ed.). Lenvit.

3. Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307 [3]

4. Council of Europe (2020), Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, available at www.coe.int/lang-cefr

5. Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

6. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010

7. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research (Language Learning & Language Teaching, Vol. 42). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42

8. Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2026, January 16). Henry Higgins.

9. Galante, A., & Thomson, R. I. (2017). The effectiveness of drama as an instructional approach for the development of second language oral fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 115–142.

10. Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language: New models, new norms, new goals. Oxford University Press.

11. Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377.

12. Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu040

13. Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

14. Lord, G. (2008). Podcasting communities and second language pronunciation. Foreign Language Annals, 41(2), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03297.x

15. McCrocklin, S., & Levis, J. (2025). Automatic speech recognition and pronunciation learning. Language Teaching (First View), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444825100852

16. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x

17. Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2002). Feedback in computer assisted pronunciation training: When technology meets pedagogy. Proceedings of InSTIL/ICALL Symposium.

18. Poliakova, O. V., Dolnyk, I. M., & Shcherbyna, A. V. (2024). Специфіка постановки звуків англійської мови українським студентам. Наукові записки. Серія: Філологічні науки, 3(210). https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-4077-2024-210-35

19. Saito, K. (2012). Effects of instruction on L2 pronunciation development: A synthesis of 15 quasi-experimental intervention studies. TESOL Quarterly.

20. Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69(3), 652–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12345

21. Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca: A complete introduction to the theoretical nature and practical implications of English used as a lingua franca. Oxford University Press.

Published

2026-01-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Nesterenko, N., & Lysenko, K. (2026). PROBLEMS OF ENGLISH PRONUNCIATION CORRECTION IN THE FIRST YEAR OF STUDY AT A LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITY. PROBLEMS OF SEMANTICS, PRAGMATICS AND COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS, 1(49), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-6530.2026.49.131-142